Hardware Requirements in comparison to VS and MF

Discussion area for users participating in Beta testing of Vehicle Simulator. When posting, please try to describe what actions you took to cause a fault/bug to appear.

Re: Hardware Requirements in comparison to VS and MF

Postby matto_mati » Sun Mar 15, 2009 8:30 am

Medessec wrote:256 MB RAM
15 GB Hard Drive
Intel Celeron 1GHz (Tulatin) Processor
Intel Graphics 830M controller with 8MB of committed graphics memory(ouch)
running Windows XP Home with Pro scripts(can't download XP SP3 because of the XP Pro runtimes in XP Home)
1024x768 Display

This can run Virtual Sailor at 21 FPS and Micro Flight at 27 FPS. Vehicle Simulator crashes this.
So, what do you think?


I think you need to read the minimal requirements here:
http://www.hangsim.com/vsf/requirements.php

You are way below them.
User avatar
matto_mati
 
Posts: 316
Joined: Mon Jun 16, 2008 10:05 am
Preferred Sim: Vehicle Simulator

Re: Hardware Requirements in comparison to VS and MF

Postby matto_mati » Sun Mar 15, 2009 6:47 pm

Medessec wrote:I have also read the VS and MF requirements, they are not much less than VSF's requirements.


Requirements for MF:
Pentium II
Windows 98/Me/XP/2000
DirectX8.1
Sound card
3D graphic accelerator

Requirements for VS:
Pentium 3 with 800 GHz
256 MB RAM.
Video card with DirectX8 compatibility and 32 MB RAM.
Windows 2000, XP, Vista
DirectX9 installed.

Requirements for VSF:
CPU: Intel Pentium 4 2.0 GHz, Intel Core 2.0 GHz, AMD Athlon 2000 or better
RAM: 1GB
Video Card: NVIDIA GeForce 6800 GT, ATI Radeon 9800 Pro or better
VRAM: 128MB of Graphics Memory
Sound Card: DirectX 9.0c Compatible
OS: Microsoft Windows XP or Vista
DirectX: DX9.0c or DX10

Medessec, the requirements are very very different. For example you need 4 times the RAM to run VSF as to run VS.
User avatar
matto_mati
 
Posts: 316
Joined: Mon Jun 16, 2008 10:05 am
Preferred Sim: Vehicle Simulator


Return to VSF Beta Testing

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Google [Bot] and 1 guest